NEHA Logo  Food Safety Reviews

 



 

NEHA Home

Food Safe Schools

USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database

Reviews Home

 


 


Food Safety Resources Reviews

Disclaimer

General Information

Title:  Ask Sofia Safe About Food Safety
Producer/Publisher:   KNB Productions
Review Date:   6/1/2003
Format(s): Videocassette
Audience(s):
Parents/Family/Consumer
Detailed Information

Overall Comments On Resource Reviewed:


Positive Points of the Reviewed Resource:

This video is useful to consumers and high school home economics classes. This video provides basic knowledge for people at home.

Negative Points of the Reviewed Resource:

The video does not touch on some very important food safety regulations and hazards. The points that were made were not explained as well as they should have been. This video would not be useful as food safety training for any food establishment or organization.

General Comments:

Some of the language used within the video felt as though it was geared for a younger audience. For basic purposes the video might be useful, but overall it was lacking quality material.

Summary:

This video is useful to consumers and high school home economics classes. It provides basic knowledge, but does not include some very important food safety regulations and hazards. The points that were made were not explained very well, and overall it was lacking quality material.

Rating:

Recommended with Reservations


PART I

All Materials

1. Content:

Purpose:

Purpose of resource is clearly stated in title or introduction

 Yes

If not, please explain:


Organization:

Resource is well-organized and major points are presented clearly. Resource does not assume that reader has background information.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:


Accuracy:

Information, technical or otherwise, is accurate and recommendations are current.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:


Consistency with Current Food Code

The latest version of the Food Code is used and the information is consistent with that code.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:

The basic Food Code is up to date, however, there are many sub versions to the code references made in the video that are questionable.

Learning Activities, Questions, Projects, or Interactive Learning Tools:

Resource includes a variety of stimulating and interesting learning experiences, questions, projects, or suggestions for further action that will involve the audience (e.g., an activity where the participant rates their current food safety practices).

Material is designed to be used without learning activities, questions, projects, or interactive learning tools.

If not, pleae give specific examples:


Special Interests:

Resource is geared toward special needs and interests of intended target audience(s).

Yes

If not, please explain:

It depends on what target it is aimed toward (families, parents, or consumer).

Scope:

Scope of information is appropriate for target audience(s) and essential topics are discussed in appropriate detail.

No

Summary:

All major ideas are summarized or reviewed to reinforce key concepts; summaries are easily identified.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:


Objectivity/Sponsor Bias:

Subject matter is presented objectively and fairly. No brand name is mentioned or obvious sponsor bias.

Yes
2. Diversity:

Positive Role Models:

Positive role models are provided in text and illustrations. Role models are presented as having many roles, traits, and emotions.

Yes

If not, please explain


 
Multi-Cultural Representation:

Resource does not include any outright negative stereotypes concerning racial, religious, or ethnic groups.
Yes

If not, please give specific examples:


Instructional Aids:

Not Needed

If not needed, please explain:


Availability of Aids:


If aids do not exist or are not necessary, please explain:



Instructor’s Guide:

Instructor’s guide is included with suggestions for enhancing audiovisual presentation, pre-, and post-showing. Suggestions or follow-up learning activities/discussion questions are included.


If instructor’s guide is not included, is one needed?


Please explain:



Instructor Resources:

Instructor resources are included and reinforce the information provided in the curriculum.


If instructor resources are not included, should they be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum?


Please explain:



Student Resources:

Student resources are included and reinforce the information provided in the curriculum.


If student resources are not included, should they be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum?


Please explain:



Credits, References, and Resources (including dates, publishers, etc.):

Complete credits, current references, date produced, and resources listed are up-to-date (credits may be on video package).


If not, please give specific examples:



 

Part II

Print Resources Only
(if applicable)

Readability:
Vocabulary:

Vocabulary is appropriate for intended audience(s).Resource minimizes use of technical terms and if used, they are defined.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:



Writing Style:
 

Main ideas are clear and flow smoothly.

Yes

If not, please give specific examples:



Writing Approach:

Writing approach is positive, personal and involves the reader. Active voice is used most of the time.

Yes

If not, please explain:



If not, please give specific examples:



If not, please give specific examples:



Please comment:



Please comment:



If headings are not provided for each topic area, would they be helpful? Please explain:





Part III
Audiovisual Resources Only
(if applicable)

5. Audiovisual Presentation Format:

Quality:

Audiovisual resource is mutually supportive to the presentation of concepts.

Yes

If not, please explain:


Presentation:

Presentation progresses at a pace that permits comprehension. Pacing of dialogue is appropriate for absorbing concepts presented. Blank time is provided.

Yes

If not, please explain:


 
6. Technical Quality:

Auditory Quality:

Speaker, voice, and music are clear; sound is audible and has good quality.

Yes

If not, please explain:


Visual Quality:

Visuals are clear and properly framed; graphics and titles are clearly visible; and color, lighting, and editing enhance presentation content.

Yes

If not, please explain:


Continuity:

Continuity provides cohesiveness and smooth flow. Visuals are in a logical order and auditory portion is precisely matched with visual portion.

No

If not, please explain:

The video seemed to jump around a bit. Some of the points stated within the program could have been elaborated.


Disclaimer: The National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) is a 501 (c)(3) not-for-profit professional society. As such, the sole purpose and mission of the organization is the educational and scientific advancement of the environmental health profession. In keeping with this mission, this article is provided for informational purposes only. It is designed to better inform our members about topical and relevant food safety resource and training materials available to the environmental health professional. It in no way represents the views, opinions or policy statements of the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA). Any opinions expressed about any food safety resource and training materials in this column (either expressly or implied) are solely and completely the responsibility of the author(s)and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the author(s) employer nor the views or opinions of the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).


| Reviews Home | NEHA | Food Safe Schools |
| USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database |