|
|
|
Food Safety Resources Reviews General Information
Overall Comments On Resource Reviewed: Positive Points of the Reviewed Resource: The use of medical experts, the short answer discussion, and quizzes allows for an experienced instructor to drive home the importance the topic deserves. The demonstrating of actual handwashing would have been beneficial. The use of one teaspoon of bleach to one cup of water for sanitizing purposes would be an almost excessive amount considering the parts-per-million break down. A little more time spent at first on the listing of at-risk foods for the populations would have added to the video. The video could be used as an important follow up to stressing the importance of practicing food safety for all. A competent instructor could get a lot across to the participants. The video is designed at a pace that is comfortable for the participants and allows for an instructor to bring home the importance of food safety and test their knowledge base of the topic. Rating:Recommended
PART I
All Materials 1. Content:
Purpose: Yes If not, please explain: Organization: Yes If not, please give specific examples: Accuracy: No If not, please give specific examples: The text incorrectly lists 40 degrees Fahrenheit - 140 degrees Fahrenheit for the danger zone.
Consistency with Current Food Code No If not, please give specific examples: Please see the above comment.
Learning Activities, Questions, Projects, or Interactive Learning Tools: Yes If not, pleae give specific examples: Yes, if the instructor chooses to utilize learning activities to promote discussion.
Special Interests: Yes If not, please explain:
Scope: Yes Please explain: Summary: Yes If not, please give specific examples:
Objectivity/Sponsor Bias: Yes2. Diversity:
Positive Role Models: Yes If not, please explain Multi-Cultural Representation: Resource does not include any outright negative stereotypes concerning racial, religious, or ethnic groups. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Instructional Aids:
If not needed, please explain: They are provided in the form of quizzes and discussion for instructor use. Availability of Aids:
If aids do not exist or are not necessary, please explain: Yes If instructor’s guide is not included, is one needed? Yes Please explain: The material allows for pre- and post-tests for evaluation purposes.
Instructor Resources: Yes If instructor resources are not included, should they
be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Yes Please explain: The material is supplied, but the instructor would be required to have a good basic knowledge of food safety to elicit discussion.
Student Resources: Yes If student resources are not included, should they be
included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Yes Please explain: They are provided in the form of quizzes and discussion. A pen and paper would be required for the participants.
Credits, References, and Resources (including dates, publishers, etc.): Yes If not, please give specific examples: Print Resources Only (if applicable) Vocabulary: Vocabulary is appropriate for intended audience(s).Resource minimizes use of technical terms and if used, they are defined. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Technical terms are mentioned, but apply to the material presented. Main ideas are clear and flow smoothly. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Writing approach is positive, personal and involves the reader. Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please explain: Illustrations contribute to the resource and are on the same page as their text references.Tables and graphs are simple, easy-to-read, and in a form requiring no further explanation. Yes If not, please give specific examples: The use of medical experts for the identified at-risk populations is an excellent qualifier of the importance of the topic. Illustrations contribute to the material and are on the same page as their text references.Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please give specific examples: The use of medical experts for the identified at-risk populations is an excellent qualifier of the importance of the topic. Resource uses a heavy weight paper and print from one side cannot be seen on the other side. Text is written in a font size greater than 11 point type, is not difficult to read, and the main body of print is not written in capital letters. Yes Please comment: You would have to print the material from the CD-ROM so the font can be controlled. Color, design, and layout of resource are attractive and stimulate interest without being too busy. A good balance between print and blank space is on the page. Yes Please comment: Clear headings are provided for each topic area. Yes If headings are not provided for each topic area, would they be helpful? Please explain: Part III Audiovisual Resources Only (if applicable) 5. Audiovisual Presentation Format:
Quality: Yes If not, please explain:
Presentation:
If not, please explain: The video is intended to be interactive for the participants allowing for pace consideration. 6. Technical Quality:
Auditory Quality: Yes If not, please explain: Visual Quality:
If not, please explain: Continuity: Yes If not, please explain: Disclaimer: The National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) is a
501 (c)(3) not-for-profit professional society. As such, the sole purpose and
mission of the organization is the educational and scientific advancement of the
environmental health profession. In keeping with this mission, this article is
provided for informational purposes only. It is designed to better inform our
members about topical and relevant food safety resource and training materials
available to the environmental health professional. It in no way represents the
views, opinions or policy statements of the National Environmental Health
Association (NEHA). Any opinions expressed about any food safety resource and
training materials in this column (either expressly or implied) are solely and
completely the responsibility of the author(s)and do not necessarily represent
the views or opinions of the author(s) employer nor the views or opinions of the
National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).
| USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database | |