|
|
|
Food Safety Resources Reviews General Information
Overall Comments On Resource Reviewed: Positive Points of the Reviewed Resource: This report goes beyond the basics of food safety. It is a reality check on the status and number of soup kitchens/feeding centers. Ten modules cover the subject matter. Samples in the Appendices are excellent.(Food Safety Quiz, Scenarios, goals, poster and sample slides) Availability of various versions (Food Code, NY, NYC) is helpful. Cost of the Trainers Kit may be too high for those who really need it. The report does not delve into the HACCP-based part of the program. Everyone should have access to safe food, whether it is at a restaurant or a soup kitchen. Jurisdictions with limited involvement at feeding centers OR those without foodhandler training programs may wish to consider the value of this material. Overall, this train-the-trainer packet is comprehensive and could add significantly to the knowledge of soup kitchen workers. It addresses issues common and unique to the soup kitchen arena. Rating:Recommended
PART I
All Materials 1. Content:
Purpose: Yes If not, please explain: Organization: Yes If not, please give specific examples: Report provides numerous statistics. Accuracy: No If not, please give specific examples: Example slides (Appendix J, pg 43 the Invisible Enemy) provide different numbers for foodborne illness cases than on page 10. (Pg 10 is current info.)
Consistency with Current Food Code Yes If not, please give specific examples: Options for Food Code, New York State and New York City versions are listed in the booklet.
Learning Activities, Questions, Projects, or Interactive Learning Tools: Yes If not, pleae give specific examples: Evaluation forms, follow-up forms, safe food handling scenarios and a food safety quiz is provided.
Special Interests: Yes If not, please explain:
Scope: Yes Please explain: Report highlights issues for soup kitchens, results for food safety quiz and areas of of possible program emphasis. Summary: No If not, please give specific examples: This booklet is a report on a HACCP based audio visual education program. The program is geared toward training the trainer.
Objectivity/Sponsor Bias: Yes2. Diversity:
Positive Role Models: Yes If not, please explain Multi-Cultural Representation: Resource does not include any outright negative stereotypes concerning racial, religious, or ethnic groups. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Instructional Aids:
If not needed, please explain: This is the Report on the use of the Trainer's Kit. The kit is $50 for CD and $350 listed for the slide version. Availability of Aids:
If aids do not exist or are not necessary, please explain: Yes If instructor’s guide is not included, is one needed? Yes Please explain:
Instructor Resources: Yes If instructor resources are not included, should they
be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Yes Please explain: Sample of slides is shown in Appendix J.
Student Resources: Yes If student resources are not included, should they be
included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Yes Please explain: Students would be directed to "A Soup Kitchen Worker's Guide to Food Safety"
Credits, References, and Resources (including dates, publishers, etc.): Yes If not, please give specific examples: Print Resources Only (if applicable) Vocabulary: Vocabulary is appropriate for intended audience(s).Resource minimizes use of technical terms and if used, they are defined. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Main ideas are clear and flow smoothly. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Writing approach is positive, personal and involves the reader. Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please explain: Illustrations contribute to the resource and are on the same page as their text references.Tables and graphs are simple, easy-to-read, and in a form requiring no further explanation. Yes If not, please give specific examples: One table lists "Soup Kitchens that thin meals" and "Food Pantries that thin packages". This terminology may not be common to most people. Illustrations contribute to the material and are on the same page as their text references.Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please give specific examples: One table lists "Soup Kitchens that thin meals" and "Food Pantries that thin packages". This terminology may not be common to most people. Resource uses a heavy weight paper and print from one side cannot be seen on the other side. Text is written in a font size greater than 11 point type, is not difficult to read, and the main body of print is not written in capital letters. Yes Please comment: Font size is very readable. Color, design, and layout of resource are attractive and stimulate interest without being too busy. A good balance between print and blank space is on the page. Yes Please comment: Tables, charts, appendices provide good examples of materials and data. Clear headings are provided for each topic area. Yes If headings are not provided for each topic area, would they be helpful? Please explain: Part III Audiovisual Resources Only (if applicable) 5. Audiovisual Presentation Format:
Quality: Yes If not, please explain: Visual aids (Trainer's Kit) were not reviewed at this time. Sample slides in Appendix J look good.
Presentation:
If not, please explain: 6. Technical Quality:
Auditory Quality: Yes If not, please explain: Visual Quality:
If not, please explain: Continuity: Yes If not, please explain: Disclaimer: The National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) is a
501 (c)(3) not-for-profit professional society. As such, the sole purpose and
mission of the organization is the educational and scientific advancement of the
environmental health profession. In keeping with this mission, this article is
provided for informational purposes only. It is designed to better inform our
members about topical and relevant food safety resource and training materials
available to the environmental health professional. It in no way represents the
views, opinions or policy statements of the National Environmental Health
Association (NEHA). Any opinions expressed about any food safety resource and
training materials in this column (either expressly or implied) are solely and
completely the responsibility of the author(s)and do not necessarily represent
the views or opinions of the author(s) employer nor the views or opinions of the
National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).
| USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database | |