|
|
|
Food Safety Resources Reviews General Information
Overall Comments On Resource Reviewed: Positive Points of the Reviewed Resource: The FDA and National Science Teachers Association have produced a solid curriculum resource for both middle and high school level students that provides a solid food safety learning experience. Beyond the specific of food safety, the general biology taught also has exceptional value. This comment is not so much about the curriculum reviewed as the state of science education. With curriculums overflowing and many times centrally mandated or controlled, many teachers would struggle to find time to fully use this curriculum at either the middle or high school levels. At each level, assuming a class meets five days a week for 50 minutes, full utilization of Science and Our Food Supply would be a four-week commitment. On the other hand, a creative teacher would find it easy to reach into this curriculum and construct single labs, classes, or put together a one-week food safety mini-course that would contain a wealth of knowledge and hands-on science. From a REHS perspective and working primarily with adult learners, this material has a wealth of information that could be used in food safety training. In particular, food safety training tends to be largely lecture with some demonstration or use of audiovisuals. A food safety instructor could easily extract some of the hands-on lab exercises for adult learners. The FDA and National Science Teachers Association have produced a solid curriculum resource for both middle and high school level students that provides a solid food safety learning experience. From a REHS perspective and working primarily with adult learners, this material has a wealth of information that could also be used in food safety training for adults. Overall, this material is very worthwhile. It presents accurate information in a clear format as well as providing interactive learning. Rating:Highly Recommended
PART I
All Materials 1. Content:
Purpose: Yes If not, please explain: The introductory material at the beginning of both the middle school and high school teacher's guides provides complete information to steer the user through the complete program and make full use of the materials. It is well organized. Organization: Yes If not, please give specific examples: There are curriculum guides specifically targeted to middle and high school science teachers, but any food educator will find useable materials in the guides. This material can even be used with adult learners. Accuracy: Yes If not, please give specific examples: There is not a single inconsistency, outdated recommendation, or an ambiguity in either curriculum or the reference guide.
Consistency with Current Food Code Yes If not, please give specific examples: The Food Code does not get a lot of "play" in the curriculum, but the science and recommendations were fully consistent with the Food Code.
Learning Activities, Questions, Projects, or Interactive Learning Tools: Yes If not, pleae give specific examples: Consistent with the National Science Teacher's Association philosophy of hands-on, inquiry-based learning, these two curriculum guides covered almost every major learning concept with appropriate science-rich activities.
Special Interests: Yes If not, please explain: Both curriculum guides were grade-level appropriate, and the teacher reference was appropriately designed for the professional science teacher.
Scope: Yes Please explain: The middle school and high school curriculums were grade level appropriate; they had clear educational goals and objectives and met these through largely activity-based lessons/classes. Summary: Yes If not, please give specific examples: In addition to summarizing key concepts, the curriculum guides contain, in tabular format, all of the National Science Educator's Standards and are in-depth in which each is addressed in each module. This is very helpful to teachers and administrators.
Objectivity/Sponsor Bias: Yes2. Diversity:
Positive Role Models: Yes If not, please explain Multi-Cultural Representation: Resource does not include any outright negative stereotypes concerning racial, religious, or ethnic groups. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Instructional Aids:
If not needed, please explain: Availability of Aids:
If aids do not exist or are not necessary, please explain: Please see previous comment. Yes If instructor’s guide is not included, is one needed? Please explain:
Instructor Resources: Yes If instructor resources are not included, should they
be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Please explain:
Student Resources: Yes If student resources are not included, should they be
included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Please explain: The depth of the curriculum guides is impressive: lab reports, guided questionnaire, lab directions, further explorations, etc. are all included. The graphics are of high quality to be scanned or photocopied.
Credits, References, and Resources (including dates, publishers, etc.): Yes If not, please give specific examples: Each module has learning extensions (additional activities) and a substantial list of research resources. Print Resources Only (if applicable) Vocabulary: Vocabulary is appropriate for intended audience(s).Resource minimizes use of technical terms and if used, they are defined. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Materials, such as lab reports and worksheets in both the middle and high school guides are age-appropriate and reading level appropriate. Also, many students, although aimed at teachers, could use the reference guide. Main ideas are clear and flow smoothly. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Both curriculums clearly state their educational goals and objectives and then lay out their modules in a manner that is clear, easy to follow, and succeeds in meeting the stated goals and objectives. Writing approach is positive, personal and involves the reader. Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please explain: Illustrations contribute to the resource and are on the same page as their text references.Tables and graphs are simple, easy-to-read, and in a form requiring no further explanation. Yes If not, please give specific examples: There is a lot of information on each page, but it is all clearly grouped or boxed for the ease of the teacher and for extraction for direct student use. Illustrations contribute to the material and are on the same page as their text references.Active voice is used most of the time. Yes If not, please give specific examples: There is a lot of information on each page, but it is all clearly grouped or boxed for the ease of the teacher and for extraction for direct student use. Resource uses a heavy weight paper and print from one side cannot be seen on the other side. Text is written in a font size greater than 11 point type, is not difficult to read, and the main body of print is not written in capital letters. Yes Please comment: Color, design, and layout of resource are attractive and stimulate interest without being too busy. A good balance between print and blank space is on the page. Yes Please comment: Most pages are full, but the layout is superb, so it is not a drawback or problem. Clear headings are provided for each topic area. Yes If headings are not provided for each topic area, would they be helpful? Please explain: The headings are consistent as one moves from module to module, which is helpful. Part III Audiovisual Resources Only (if applicable) 5. Audiovisual Presentation Format:
Quality: Yes If not, please explain:
Presentation:
If not, please explain: Keeping in mind the bulk of this material is a teacher's guide; the pace in which ideas and concepts are put forth is under the control of the teacher. 6. Technical Quality:
Auditory Quality: Yes If not, please explain: The video accompanying the material was professionally done, scientifically accurate, and supports the curriculum's learning objectives. Visual Quality:
If not, please explain: Continuity: Yes If not, please explain: Disclaimer: The National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) is a
501 (c)(3) not-for-profit professional society. As such, the sole purpose and
mission of the organization is the educational and scientific advancement of the
environmental health profession. In keeping with this mission, this article is
provided for informational purposes only. It is designed to better inform our
members about topical and relevant food safety resource and training materials
available to the environmental health professional. It in no way represents the
views, opinions or policy statements of the National Environmental Health
Association (NEHA). Any opinions expressed about any food safety resource and
training materials in this column (either expressly or implied) are solely and
completely the responsibility of the author(s)and do not necessarily represent
the views or opinions of the author(s) employer nor the views or opinions of the
National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).
| USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database | |