|
|
|
Food Safety Resources Reviews General Information
Overall Comments On Resource Reviewed: Positive Points of the Reviewed Resource: I was particularly impressed with the number of mutually reinforcing (but not repetitive) activities. In addition, I liked the inclusion of an educational session for parents, as well as pre-written articles for classroom newsletters. The curriculum contains many typographical errors. Most of them do not affect comprehension, however, they do make it more difficult to read. This curriculum is a good summary of bacterial growth and food safety for young children. In the four days since we watched the video together, my four-year-old will only allow food to be on the counter for a minute or two before he reminds me, "Remember Momma, in the food safety movie, they said to not leave food on the counter." This curriculum is a good summary of bacterial growth and food safety for young children. There are many activities for the children to reinforce the material as well as to keep interest up, and even information for parents. Rating:Recommended
PART I
All Materials 1. Content:
Purpose: Yes If not, please explain: Organization: Yes If not, please give specific examples: Accuracy: No If not, please give specific examples: On page II-1, Definitions, under food safety, rancidity and browning are given as examples of "chemical contamination," and drying is used as an example of "physical contamination." While these ARE examples of chemical and physical changes in food, they are NOT contamination, and they are not safety problems.
Consistency with Current Food Code Yes If not, please give specific examples:
Learning Activities, Questions, Projects, or Interactive Learning Tools: Yes If not, pleae give specific examples: The package includes games, puppet shows, and other age-appropriate activities, which are all tied to the video and the concept of food safety.
Special Interests: Yes If not, please explain:
Scope: Yes Please explain: A few vocabulary words, such as a detective looking for "leads," and "deputizing" the kids in the class, as well as the concept of bacteria multiplying "20 minutes later" may be too advanced for some preschoolers, but this problem could be surmounted by teachers. Summary: Yes If not, please give specific examples:
Objectivity/Sponsor Bias: Yes2. Diversity:
Positive Role Models: Yes If not, please explain Multi-Cultural Representation: Resource does not include any outright negative stereotypes concerning racial, religious, or ethnic groups. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Instructional Aids:
If not needed, please explain: Availability of Aids:
If aids do not exist or are not necessary, please explain: Yes If instructor’s guide is not included, is one needed? Please explain:
Instructor Resources: Yes If instructor resources are not included, should they
be included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Please explain:
Student Resources: Yes If student resources are not included, should they be
included to reinforce the information provided in the curriculum? Please explain:
Credits, References, and Resources (including dates, publishers, etc.): No If not, please give specific examples: A production date is not listed on the package. Print Resources Only (if applicable) Vocabulary: Vocabulary is appropriate for intended audience(s).Resource minimizes use of technical terms and if used, they are defined. No If not, please give specific examples: The words "leads" and "deputize" are included in preschooler's material, and the word "implication" is used in the parent's letter. Depending on the parent audience, this could be too advanced of a word. Main ideas are clear and flow smoothly. Yes If not, please give specific examples: Writing approach is positive, personal and involves the reader. Active voice is used most of the time. No If not, please explain: The material is primarily a curriculum outline and as such uses phrases like, "The teacher will..." and "The students will...." Illustrations contribute to the resource and are on the same page as their text references.Tables and graphs are simple, easy-to-read, and in a form requiring no further explanation. No If not, please give specific examples: Illustrations are primarily intended as handouts to be copied and given to children as activity sheets. As such, they are not on the same page as the teacher instructions for that activity.
The curriculum also acknowledges that the illustrations for the "What is Wrong" activity are difficult to decipher (pg. C-22). Illustrations contribute to the material and are on the same page as their text references.Active voice is used most of the time. No If not, please give specific examples: Illustrations are primarily intended as handouts to be copied and given to children as activity sheets. As such, they are not on the same page as the teacher instructions for that activity.
The curriculum also acknowledges that the illustrations for the "What is Wrong" activity are difficult to decipher (pg. C-22). Please comment: N/A The pages are printed on one side. Color, design, and layout of resource are attractive and stimulate interest without being too busy. A good balance between print and blank space is on the page. No Please comment: The color is N/A because the material is black and white, and the certificate is not centered on the page (pg. C-144). Clear headings are provided for each topic area. Yes If headings are not provided for each topic area, would they be helpful? Please explain: Part III Audiovisual Resources Only (if applicable) 5. Audiovisual Presentation Format:
Quality: Yes If not, please explain: The video is integral to the material.
Presentation:
If not, please explain: 6. Technical Quality:
Auditory Quality: No If not, please explain: The sound quality is slightly distorted, and the soundtrack was distracting at times. Visual Quality:
If not, please explain: The animation is very rudimentary, but does not distract from viewing. My son, Jamie said, "It looked as if the pictures were drawn on TV by Momma." Continuity: Yes If not, please explain: Disclaimer: The National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) is a
501 (c)(3) not-for-profit professional society. As such, the sole purpose and
mission of the organization is the educational and scientific advancement of the
environmental health profession. In keeping with this mission, this article is
provided for informational purposes only. It is designed to better inform our
members about topical and relevant food safety resource and training materials
available to the environmental health professional. It in no way represents the
views, opinions or policy statements of the National Environmental Health
Association (NEHA). Any opinions expressed about any food safety resource and
training materials in this column (either expressly or implied) are solely and
completely the responsibility of the author(s)and do not necessarily represent
the views or opinions of the author(s) employer nor the views or opinions of the
National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).
| USDA Food Safety Training Materials Database | |